11:58 am Tech
Velikovsky revisited, again. Dr Immanuel Velikovsky, Hero or Villain?
Plasma Cosmology Astronomy Carl Sagan Cosmology Space Electricity in space Electric Universe Wal Thornhill Dave Talbott Don Scott Petroglyphs rock art dragons and serpents celtic art spirals mythology myth plasma toruses comets venus mars jupiter saturn planets catastrophism catastrophes gradualism geology astrophysics alternative science scientific suppression peer review history of the solar system empiricism
my freind i dont know if you know but the Gravity model is not proven out by observation….that is why we have to keep on creating new explantions like Dark matter and Dark energy to componsate for the lack of evidence of mass in regards to the big bang /gravity model……The Electric/Plasma model has born the corect fruits of explanation for over 1oo years now..without the need to Hypothosise new “stuff” just to keep a idea alive.
Posted by BrodyLuv2, on September 20th, 2008, at 12:38 am. #.
Darwin was aware of much information supportive of catastrophic events, but chose to ignore it for the most part. He even mentioned some of it in The Origin of The Species, like a criminal leaving clues behind him.
It’s funny how people can hold contradictory ideas in mind, and carry on regardless!
“Men occasionally stumble over the truth,” as Churchil said, “but most of them pick themselves up and carry on as if nothing ever happened.”
Posted by soupdragon42, on September 23rd, 2008, at 8:21 am. #.
“Darwin did not base his theories on this list.”
Have you read the origin of species?
“Velikovsky’s theories and predictions have been and will be quantified.”
Already now we have empirical evidence which exactly contradicts the ‘theories’ made by Velikovsky. We can blow them out of the water. Also already established fundamental laws are violated by his theories & his methodology was flawed beyond reason.
We are to overtrow everything that works because of some mythology+speculation?
Posted by infinit888, on September 25th, 2008, at 2:29 am. #.
anyhoo I kind of agree with the sentiments of the video and think that the treatment of velikovky shows how paradigm of science reeks of fundamentalism, self interest and self perpetuation. I consider this to be the death of human intelligence and death of the quest for truth.
Posted by leezus83, on September 27th, 2008, at 1:48 pm. #.
Darwin did not base his theories on this list… these are things that have been shown to support Darwinism over time, just like Velikovsky’s theories and predictions have been and will be quantified. In fact Darwin was inspired by watching ants… sure beats Mythology.
Posted by leezus83, on September 28th, 2008, at 4:06 am. #.
“Oh you mean like Darwin!?…”
Last time I checked
the geological column, geology, the fossil record, Atavisms, ERVs, Embryology, paleontology, comparative genetics, transmission and population genetics, comparative anatomy, comparative zoology…etc were all froms of physical evidence.
But if you think mythology is a more valuable scoure for evidence be my guest. Just don’t expect the courts to apply your ridicously low standards of proof.
Posted by infinit888, on September 30th, 2008, at 6:26 am. #.
“Yes lets forget that his speculations are not supported by physical evidence.”
Oh you mean like Darwin!?…
Posted by leezus83, on October 3rd, 2008, at 7:47 am. #.
“this guy could have put a lot of people out of work… ah the good ol’ scientific dogma.”
Yes lets forget that his speculations are not supported by physical evidence.
Posted by infinit888, on October 5th, 2008, at 4:44 pm. #.
this guy could have put a lot of people out of work… ah the good ol’ scientific dogma.
Posted by leezus83, on October 7th, 2008, at 10:11 pm. #.
By the way, WOW, what beautiful knowledge Beloved, we have GOT TO connect, or REconnect. This is a hugely PROFOUND statement and please, keep this coming, I hope your new video pertains to even just part of what you stated here! Your growth has been truly incredible and by the way, I feel totally opposite than I did yesterday. Feels like two different people….gettin ready for the 22nd and clearly I had to detox a bit. Let’s chat soon, I would adore your energy head on!!
Posted by LPF767, on October 10th, 2008, at 8:43 am. #.
now connect the dots litterally, to our twin universe on the 5th dimension & our true twin star (Earth in future) Arcturus, which came into alignment with us on 08/08/08 increasing earths electromagnetic frequency..the 16th and 22nd of august 08 are peaks of this energy which will be followed by more planetary alignments increasing the surge..get ready, you are full of metals which are magnetic and your internal frequency as a fragmentary body is rising fast.
Posted by Re4dSetH, on October 12th, 2008, at 11:42 am. #.
one concrete fact which surly can not be disputed is velikovskys basic premis of catastrophism which since shumaker levi is surly beyond any reasonable doubt. the idea was however dismissed as ludicrouse at the time it is however verifiable just by counting the cr4aters on the moon.
Posted by ooglebydoogleby, on October 15th, 2008, at 11:50 am. #.
Velikovski is “the bomb”. Catastrophism is the only viable “anti-darwinist” theory. Carl Sagan contributed to the silencing on Velikovski back in the day cuz if they gave it creedence, all their evolutionary theories would have to be revised. Shame on you Sagan the Pagan!
Posted by Initium0, on October 18th, 2008, at 2:45 am. #.
Yes.. many people know about this. You know they are not going to tell the general population. Have we not all seen 2010 Space Odyssey.They show the birth of a second sun. There have been people trying to get the word out for a long time now.
Posted by pleiadians777, on October 18th, 2008, at 5:06 pm. #.
Great video. Keep up the good work
Posted by TheBadAsstronomer, on October 19th, 2008, at 12:36 am. #.
I also urge people to scrutinize the evidence. The mainstream made the equally vague predition that venus would be around about the same temperature as Earth. Their prediction, while vague, was still way out.
Posted by soupdragon42, on October 20th, 2008, at 6:10 am. #.
I urge everyone watching this video to do a little research on this Velikovsky fellow. All of his so called predictions were so incredibly vague that a few were destined to be accidentally correct. Take for example the temperature of Venus. He predicted it would be hot. His reasoning? Because it was ejected from Jupiter. How hot? No temperature range, no description of the mechanism, just that it would be hot. This type of prediction comes from the horoscope, not from intelligent thought.
Posted by grude1, on October 21st, 2008, at 2:24 pm. #.
I’ve read worlds in collision 2 years ago.. got it from my father who said it might be interesting for me to read…well…it was. read it to..it’s very interesting!
Posted by ponkjesnoksel, on October 23rd, 2008, at 2:38 am. #.
Excellent video thanks for sharing!
Posted by Veetina, on October 23rd, 2008, at 10:27 pm. #.
Now scientists are discovering that everything Velikovsky said was true!
Posted by Veetina, on October 24th, 2008, at 2:55 am. #.
Start thinking in a new direction…google:
Velikovsky and the 3600 signature. Then, once you’ve read that, google: Could we see two suns in five years and listen.
Posted by gerry4ta, on October 25th, 2008, at 9:21 am. #.
was i supossed to understand all that?
Posted by neoskatedog, on October 26th, 2008, at 12:42 pm. #.
Thought provoking and inspiring. Thank you
Posted by 0siander, on September 19th, 2008, at 6:14 am. #.